Background image support of ExplorerTreeView

This forum contains the news and their comments from the old, phpBB2+ based version of the website.
Locked

How do you think about background image support in ExplorerTreeView?

Poll ended at 22 Jul 2006, 00:34

I love/need it! For heaven's sake, don't remove it!
0
No votes
I like it, but could live without it.
0
No votes
Please remove it. It's too buggy and bloats the control.
0
No votes
I really don't care.
1
100%
 
Total votes: 1

User avatar
TiKu
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 832
Joined: 28 Sep 2004, 21:10
Location: Unterföhring
Contact:

Background image support of ExplorerTreeView

Post by TiKu »

I'm working on Vista compatibility of ExplorerTreeView 1.x and 2.x. While most things are done already, the background image support drives me nuts.
Up to Windows XP/2003, the code is a horrible bunch of hacks, but it works well enough to make this feature somewhat usable. But the code doesn't work on Vista and so far all my attempts to find another working implementation have failed.
The more time I spend for ExplorerTreeView background image support, the more I tend to say it is a waste of time. I'm really thinking about dropping BkImage support, but before doing so, I'd like to hear your opinions, so I've started a vote.

Regards
TiKu
Crunching for Fab36_Folding-Division at Folding@Home. Join Fab36/Fab30! - Folding@Home and BOINC
Boycott DRM! Boycott HDCP!
Locked